(edit title) Mystery multiple assassination. Police seek motive for murders> Options

[*Guest*]

Love it.

The poor sick troll spends his day attacking me for not proving what no one else has really attempted, like all the unsolved assassinations of Palme, Francis Bradley, Stephen Hilder, Jurgen Möllemannn, Uwe Barschel, Gareth Williams, Gudrun Loftus, Steve Rawlings, the al-Hillis, Sylvain Mollier, those securocrats on the sabotaged Chinook back in 1994, Armando al-Abed, etc., ad nauseam, and not caring about clearing up all the injustices which have occurred in blaming individuals for all the conspiracies the CIA, MI6, and the Mossad have carried out, preferring instead to make mountains out of any mistake I may make.

Simply pathetic.

P. S. No one, even those hopelessly institutionalized, would go to the trouble of framing The Nine aka The Dog Turd Thrower in any way. He has already handily done.

[Jamtjim]

The poor sick troll spends his day attacking me for not proving what no one else has really attempted, like all the unsolved assassinations of Palme, Francis Bradley, Stephen Hilder, Jurgen Möllemannn, Uwe Barschel, Gareth Williams, Gudrun Loftus, Steve Rawlings, the al-Hillis, Sylvain Mollier, those securocrats on the sabotaged Chinook back in 1994, Armando al-Abed, etc., ad nauseam, and not caring about clearing up all the injustices which have occurred in blaming individuals for all the conspiracies the CIA, MI6, and the Mossad have carried out

That's because you cannot prove what didn't happen Fraudie... All you have done is present a lot of unsupported, un-evidenced and in many cases provably incorrect and fraudulent fabrications.

, preferring instead to make mountains out of any mistake I may make.

Trow, you have been caught out yet again! I understand that you must be annoyed that in all your attempts to put forward non-existent conspiracies you fail, yet of the two of us, only I have any proof of anything nefarious going on in exposing your attempt to frame The Nine for something you have done.

P. S. No one, even those hopelessly institutionalized, would go to the trouble of framing The Nine aka The Dog Turd Thrower in any way. He has already handily done

Except as we have now shown beyond reasonable doubt, Trowbrige H Ford...

Poor deluded fraud...

[*Guest*]

I am not the slightest bit annoyed at your finding out that I mistakenly copied The Nine aka Anonymous' post on Craig Murray's site.

I have explained that I mistook "that" for "what" in his post, and you have gone on endlessly about this being a complicated plot by me to hide my trying to frame The Nine for it.

Your fantasy fun at my alleged expense has reached a new low, but keep it up so other posters can see what a hopeless fool you are.

It is just "sight and fury, signifying nothing," to misquote someone of substance, not a mere turd thrower.

[Jamtjim]

I am not the slightest bit annoyed at your finding out that I mistakenly copied The Nine aka Anonymous' post on Craig Murray's site.

I have explained that I mistook "that" for "what" in his post, and you have gone on endlessly about this being a complicated plot by me to hide my trying to frame The Nine for it.

The mistake you made was making a comment that was so obviously authored by yourself, then dishonestly changing it whilst quoting, then blaming it on somebody else. The fact you did all these is clear leaving us in no doubt that you are a fraud.

Your fantasy fun at my alleged expense has reached a new low, but keep it up so other posters can see what a hopeless fool you are.

It's a bit more than fantasy I am afraid to say. You see Fraudie, I can present evidence which backs up what I say, this is just one of the way we are different. Have you any evidence that it was The Nine? No. Have I evidence it was you? Yes, (see my previous posts) and not only that evidence which confirms what we already knew or highly suspected.

Let's think for a bit, confirmatory evidence versus no evidence at all. Which is most likely to be true?

[*Guest*]

Love it.

And to think that jamtjim gets paid for it too.

Must be a full-time turd thrower.

[The Nine]

What an incredible waste of time by jamtjim, the guy who gets paid for doing such.He goes to the greatest lengths to prove that I deliberately tried to cover my tracks in post ... (show full quote)

What an incredible waste of time by jamtjim, the guy who gets paid for doing such.

He goes to the greatest lengths to prove that I deliberately tried to cover my tracks in posting the message from CM's outage thread, done by The Nine, when I just couldn't make sense of what I had written in haste. I didn't link the thread for fear one would have trouble finding it.

The Nine's message does read thus: "People might be interested to read in this blog what outline the real reasons for the outrage."

I thought it was such a misuse of the word, what, that it must be "that".

End of the lesson - Jamtjim right for once about something I did being wrong, but for the wrong reason - what was done in haste, and corrected by mistake.

No conspiracy here, just more lunacy from the leading one on the site.

Of course, still waiting for anything the slightest bit relevant to the two conspiracy murders that I have been posting about.

P. e. I am logged in at Craig Murray's site as "Trowbridge H. Ford", as I always do everywhere I post, so I could not, and would not have posted the one from "Anonymous". Just more implied lies about my using socks? ... (hide full quote)

Trowbridge, is there no limit to your delusion? As Jim quite rightly points out, do you think I am likely to post a link in support of your made ramblings? My some what sarcastic remark on the local, about reposting on Craig Murray's blog, clearly went right over your tin foil hat.

As with the numerous sites you have posted on over the years, it all begins and ends the same way. As with myself and others on the local, and also recently with Veterans News, people do seem to initially give you some credence. This isn't based on any agreement with your insight or assertions on the subjects being discussed, but more on the fact that you paint yourself as some learned retired academic with a background in U.S counter intelligence. For that reason there is a propensity for people to consider that maybe you know more about the background of a subject than they might do. For that reason they are prepared to hear you out and digest your theories.

However, as I have noticed on many sites, before too long other posters begin to see though the smoke and mirrors and realise you are just a loon. As on the Local, as soon as posters begin to question you to explain yourself in a bit more depth, you further devalue any iota of credibility by chicaning around the questions being asked, trying to introduce dis tractive tangents, and finally throwing insults. Before too long you are all washed up.

As Jim showed, you purposely manipulated Craig Murray's explanation of the website failure, in order to suggest it was caused by something it wasn't. My point about reposting was in relation to that. (i.e) Showing the posters on C/M's blog, just what you do on other sites. Twist the truth, cast aspersions, and insult peoples integrity, just to try and make things fit in to your warped deluded theory.

Had I even bothered to post on C.M's site it would have been related to that. It would have been there to just how busted you are on other sites and what a devious and malicious troll you are. It certainly would not have been a post alluding to endorse your bullshit. Once again, it 's a testimony to your delusion that you think I would do that.

Furthermore, as was pointed out, that anonymous post was undoubtedly placed by you. As Jim pointed out, not only did it contain a school boy grammatical error; it's exactly the same error you constantly make on the Local. It was also typical of you to be posting links to your own words.

So not only are you jumping to random conclusions in relation to who posted it, YOU KNOW who posted it and you are once again busy being devious in order stir up trouble.

As I have noted before, your Veterans biog states you were an analyst in Counter Intelligence and that you live under a protection programme in Sweden. The web site people on that page did not just invent that. You led them to believe it was true and it is just another example of you trying to garner credibility for your words by lying about your own life.

As with your false academic citations in the AC Dicey book, you excuse it as being the idea of an over zealous publisher. Bullshit. Those credentials are printed there because you gave them to the publisher. Publishers are very careful about that kind of thing because, should it be uncovered, then it devalues, not only the credibility of the book (and there fore its sales) but also their brand and company. Publishers do not go around inventing false academic credentials for their authors because it can affect their indemnity, should they be accused of a falsehood. They listed those academic credential because you told them they were true. Their only fault was not to check them sufficiently.

As is clear on Veterans Today, you have a track record of lying and falsifying aspects of your life to fake your own credibility.

[*Guest*]

Just going bananas about me, The Nine, when you were caught out helping spread the word about what I think about Craig Murray's outage and the conspiracy murders in France and Israel, acting as if I am reading every word you post here 24/7, and deceptively responding to it at your expense.

I am me, and have never deliberately misstated who I am, what I have done, and what has happened to me.

Not going waste any more time on your assorted bullshit.

[The Nine]

No, you never do when you paint yourself into a corner. You wrote they anon post and everyone can see you did. Peoples syntax and word usage are as individual as your hand writing and it came from you, like what I know it did.

[*Guest*]

I did not write or have anything to do with the Anonymous post yesterday on Craig Murray's outage thread, and you are COMPLETELY LYING about it, as usual.

Case closed unless you want to make a judicial fight about it by telling me who you are, and where you live in the UK, so that I can start proceedings against you for defaming me - what the British courts are entertaining now.

[The Nine]

I did not write or have anything to do with the Anonymous post yesterday on Craig Murray's outage thread, and you are COMPLETELY LYING about it, as usual.Case closed unles ... (show full quote)

I did not write or have anything to do with the Anonymous post yesterday on Craig Murray's outage thread, and you are COMPLETELY LYING about it, as usual.

Case closed unless you want to make a judicial fight about it by telling me who you are, and where you live in the UK, so that I can start proceedings against you for defaming me - what the British courts are entertaining now. ... (hide full quote)

So if you say its closed, that's it? Because you say so? Or let me put it another way, because you want to bury your head in the sand having been conclusively busted yet again.

I did not write or have anything to do with the Anonymous post yesterday on Craig Murray's outage thread, and you are COMPLETELY LYING about it, as usual.

However, you saw fit to accuse me of having posted it prior to myself or Jim spotting the Trow-ism grammatical error that led all to know you posted it. (An error that was then reposted in a number of your previous posts to conclusively show it was you)

and you are COMPLETELY LYING about it, as usual.

A remark that once again underlines your lack of judgement and understanding. First of all it is not a lie in any way, shape or form. It is an ACCUSATION; ergo, I have accused you of being the author of that post. Should you prove otherwise you would have disproved my ACCUSATION. However, at no point (and certainly not in law) could it be considered a lie. A lie is when you knowingly state the untrue. I have not done that. I have stated what I believe to be true. ergo, It cannot be construed as a lie.

At this moment in time, I 100% think you posted that post. The evidence for that is that the post contained a recurring grammatical error common only to you in many other posts, and that it once again lead the reader to a further post by you. The second point being a recurring theme on The Local over the years.

I would suggest that before you begin making threats of litigation you consider the evidence. Secondly, you had already made the accusation that I was behind it. However, being that the EVIDENCE strongly points to you being the author, that would mean you made an accusation against me in the full knowledge that it wasn't true. (i.e) You lied.

Trowbridge, if you want to spend your money on court action against me, you are more than free to do that and I will happily send you a PM with my address and details. However, you won't take any action because you know that I can strike you straight out of the ball park.

what the British courts are entertaining now

There you go again with that give away grammar error.!! We all occasionally shoot ourselves in the foot, but Its incredible you have any feet left. Both barrels yet again!!

[*Guest*]

I accused you of lying because you are the one who posted on Craig Murray's site just two minutes after you had recommended that someone do so here in order to show what a loony I am - what completely backfired.

I am most serious about suing you for conspiring continually to defame, so send me that PM with your name and address so that I can have you investigated in preparation for an action against you, wherever you reside.

Hope the case now is not closed, not just more bullshit from you.

[Jamtjim]

I accused you of lying because you are the one who posted on Craig Murray's site just two minutes after you had recommended that someone do so here in order to show what a loony I am - what completely backfired.

Except that you have no evidence of that, nothing. On the other hand the evidence that you have not only made the post, but that you have tried to frame somebody else for doing it is overwhelming. You made that post, you know it, I know it, The Nine knows it and so does everybody else. The Keystone Cop of Conspiracy has shown himself to be just as incompetent when it comes to lying and framing somebody.

Look Fraudie, it really is time you gave this up. Your dishonesty has been conclusively demonstrated yet again and in the unlikely eventuality that anyone gave you or your silly stories any credence before, his time the consequences are fatal. From now on, whenever you make a claim, all we need to do is to point to this particular incident of exposed fraud and anybody new to your daftness will instantly know that you are not to be trusted or, heaven forbid, taken seriously.

Before when you have been caught out, like in your admission that you faked your academic qualifications in your now long out of print book (you lied about that as well remember), or in your fabricated and now dis-proven stories you actions were largely benign; all they did was expose you as a liar and fraud. This time you have been caught out knowingly and deliberately making false accusations against another poster who you are trying to frame as being dishonest. Behaviour like this is disgraceful, but this is not the first time is it?

Remember when you accused me of posting pornography? In case you didn't, here's the link:

http://www.thelocal.se/discuss/index.php?s...c=39681&hl=

So we see conclusively that you have lied about the actions of other posters before.

Now I can let this ride as I enjoy you and your silliness too much to be put off by you making such obviously false accusations about me, but I think that The Nine would be well within his rights to ask the administrators to have you removed as you have evidently used false accusations to smear him. As you have posted statements which you know to be untrue, and upon multiple occasions, as well as used threats to try to stop people defending themselves from your allegations, I think that the powers that be would have little choice but to remove you just as you have likely been removed from so many other sites.

Not that I think that would stop you though. You have been exposed using pseudonyms; it would only be a matter of time before one of these was brought back into life and you would continue as before. But at least it would show you up once again for being the fraud you undoubtedly are as well as setting a precedent from TL that malicious behaviour like yours will not simply be accepted!

[*Guest*]

Just more ranting fury by jamtjim and his socks, signifying nothing.

I have never used a pseudonym, and did not make the post on Craig Murray's site by Anonymous about the outage at 1:11pm on Wednesday, just two minutes after your sock The Nine called for it on this thread at 1:09pm.

Still no PM about who you are, and where you can be served with papers about a legal action I have long sought against you, a vile defamer of me with your fabricated lies, and libels.

[Jamtjim]

Just more ranting fury by jamtjim and his socks, signifying nothing.

Well it signified, no demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt, that you are a constant, serial fraudster.

I have never used a pseudonym, and did not make the post on Craig Murray's site by Anonymous about the outage at 1:11pm on Wednesday, just two minutes after your sock The Nine called for it on this thread at 1:09pm.

Yeah you have, we all know it. You used the name "Anonymous" to write a post which you then fraudulently tried to blame on The Nine. This is beyond doubt and your attempt to hide this by altering the quote containing a trademark Trowbridge grammatical mistake only serves to confirm it.

Still no PM about who you are, and where you can be served with papers about a legal action I have long sought against you, a vile defamer of me with your fabricated lies, and libels.

I have never promised to PM you anything. Why would I? I don't need the hassle of being stalked by you just like you have been stalking the real people you mention in your latest work of fiction. Add to that that you have made threats against and called for the murder of people who you don't like, I think that providing you with any personal information would be folly in the extreme.

[*Guest*]

Just the expected drivel from our leading, cowardly fraudster, jamtjim and his socks!